Oscar Thoughts #1

The Academy Awards for 2025 films will happen on March 15th. Nominations are out and Academy members are in the process of voting. While I am not a member, I do have some thoughts on the various races.

BEST PICTURE

There are ten nominees in this category. Two of the nominees are foreign films, one from Norway (“Sentimental Value”), the other from Brazil (The Secret Agent”), I don’t think either of them has a chance to win The front runners are “Sinners” and “One Battle After Another”. The former is a vampire film with a predominantly black cast from the creator of “Black Panther”.. It set a record for nominations: 16. “One Battle After Another” is from Paul Thomas Anderson, a writer, producer and director who, makes brilliant, but overly long movies. (In my opinion, he should hire an editor.) This film is more coherent than most of his previous efforts and has received a lot of praise. Going into awards season it was the front runner, but “Sinners”, which came out earlier in the year is now neck-and-neck with it. If I were voting, my choice would be “Hamnet”, the story of how William Shakespeare wrote “Hamlet”. It is a compelling story, has great acting and is very well done. Unfortunately, it doesn’t stand a chance.

What will win: “One Battle After Another”

My Choice: “Hamnet”

BEST ACTOR

I believe this race is between Timothy Chalamet for “Marty Supreme” and Ethan Hawke for “Blue Moon”. Leonardo DiCaprio is nominated for “One Battle After Another” as well as Michael B. Jordan (Finally!), for “Sinners”, but they are not the front runners. Wagner Moura for “The Secret Agent” was good, but doesn’t stand a chance. Chalamet deserved an Oscar last year for his turn as Bob Dylan in “A Complete Unknown”. He is as good or better in “Marty Supreme”. It doesn’t hurt his chances that he is this year’s “It” boy. But for my money Ethan Hawke gave the male performance of the year as Lorenz Hart, Richard Rogers first writing partner, in “Blue Moon”. The film was extremely well written and Hawke, in extreme make up, is nothing short of brilliant. I will not be disappointed if Chalamet wins, but Hawke gives a once in a lifetime performance.

Who will win: Timothy Chalamet for “Marty Supreme”

My Choice: Ethan Hawke for “Blue Moon”

To be continued…

How to Make a Killing

“How to Make a Killing” has a similar plot to the 1949 British film “Kind Hearts and Coronets”, black comedy starring Alec Guiness. The plot centers around a poor man who has a number of relatives ahead of him to inherit a fortune. He ends up killing all of them so that he is the sole heir. “How to Make a Killing” follows a similar plot with Glen Powell as the poor relative. He comically bumps off seven relatives without getting caught, but ends up in jail in an ironic way The methods he uses are clever and funny. Of course there are a couple of romances and the ending is not expected, This is light entertainment. Powell is enjoyable and the supporting cast is quite good. Worth seeing.

Wuthering Heights

It’s been a while since I wrote a review, so here goes. “Wuthering Heights” is the latest film from Emerald Fennell who gave us “Promising Young Woman” and “Saltburn”. I liked both of those films. They were very entertaining with some twists. She is a very stylized film maker and her version of “Wuthering Heights” is the same. I have seen the 1939 version starring Laurence Olivier and Merle Oberon. That version was quite good and is considered a classic. Fennell’s version follows the same plot, but with more eroticism. Margot Robbie and Jacob Eloridi play the doomed lovers. Even though the story takes place in the 1800’s the leads are very modern. There is a great deal of chemistry between them and I wouldn’t be surprised if they work together again. Elordi is a new star who is proving to be a matinee idol and good actor. His turn as the monster in the new “Frankenstein” yielded him a Best Supporting Actor nomination. In “Wuthering Heights” he proves that he can play a romantic lead. This is a period piece and I would say that women will enjoy it more than men. Still I enjoyed the film.

The Substance

Demi Moore’s comeback movie is “The Substance”. In it she plays an aging actress who is being put out to pasture. She signs up for a program that develops a new, younger version of herself. Both of them co-exist, but it does not go well after a while. Moore is winning a lot of Best Actress awards for this role and the film is also getting a lot of praise. However, it struck me as a horror film with expensive special effects. Plenty of blood and guts. While I was impressed by Demi Moore’s performance I did not feel the same way about the movie.

Nickel Boys

“Nickel Boys” is the story of two black teen agers who are sent to reform school in North Florida during the Jim Crow era. One of them is a good student who is in the wrong place at the wrong time and gets sentenced to the detention facility unjustly. The young men are mistreated and humiliated on a regular basis. The ending has a twist that you will not expect. This is a film that kept me thinking about it long after it was over. There are no stars, but all of the performances are excellent. I highly recommend this film.

The Brutalist

“The Brutalist” is the epic story of visionary architect Laszlo Toft, played by Adrian Brody. It tells of his journey from Hungary to the United States where he struggles to make a new life. For a number of years he works his way up, eventually getting noticed by a rich American, played by Guy Pearce. Toft’s life has ups and downs as he tries to build something that will become his legacy. This is the first movie I’ve seen with an intermission in many years. It is long and beautifully filmed. Brody and Pearce are outstanding. It is winning a lot of awards, but I am not sure if I would vote for it for best picture. Still, it is worth seeing.

The Last Showgirl

“The Last Showgirl” is the story of an over-the-hill dancer in an out-dated Las Vegas revue that is closing. Her whole life is this second class show. We learn that she has a daughter who does not live with her and her friends are other showgirls. Pamela Anderson is the main character. She shows a lot of vulnerability and is not afraid to show her age. I did not care for this film. It was kind of gritty, showing the lower side of Vegas. Jamie Lee Curtis plays an older, former showgirl who is working as a cocktail waitress. Curtis pulls out all the stops for this role. She might end up with an Oscar nomination. Not bad, but not great.

The Room Next Door

“The Room Next Door” is the Spanish filmmaker, Pedro Almodovar’s, first film made in the U.S. Almodovar is known for his interesting, winding plots and strong female characters. This film has two very strong female actresses, Tilda Swinton and Julianne Moore, playing artistic women. The plot concerns one of the leads dying of cancer and deciding to end her life on her own terms. While the acting is good, the movie is overly talky and kind of boring. Not much happens. Like Julianne Moore’s character, we are stuck waiting for Tilda Swinton to end her life. Not much else. Not worth seeing.

Wicked, Part I

I thought “Wicked” was great. The two leads were outstanding. Cynthia Erivo and Ariana Grande did a wonderful job in the roles of Elfaba and Glinda. The rest of the cast was also quite good. The scenery, cinematography and overall execution were all excellent. Jon Chu, the director did a great job. If you can, see this on the big screen for the colors.

Gladiator II

Ridley Scott’s “Gladiator II” is a sequel to the original film from 2000. Connie Nielsen is the only actor from the first film. All of the characters are new. This time Rome has become very corrupt. Paul Mascal plays the star gladiator who in a star making role. His character is owned by Denzel Washington playing a character who plays both sides against the middle. The arena scenes are epic and the plot keeps moving. This is a worthy sequel and deserves to be seen on the big screen. Look for this film to be nominated for a lot of awards.